There are also 'true' private servers, servers open to only its creator and users the creator has notified. Private servers still exist, but fewer ones. OdinMS has been sued, and many other private servers have been shut down, faced with the DMCA threat. Recent legal actions by Nexon Corporation, however, have shut down many of the MapleStory private servers.
Happy now.? Untraceable2U ( talk) 08:06, 30 August 2008 (UTC) You said that they are the only real private servers, not private server softwares- UltraMagnus ( talk) 10:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
#New maplestory private servers code#
They did NOT CODE THEIR OWN SERVERS! Untraceable2U ( talk) 09:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Well, if the servers exist, they are real, even if they don't have many players - UltraMagnus ( talk) 15:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC) I have seen WAY to much people advertising their own servers! The some real pservers are OdinMS, NinjaMS(Coded in Delphi), and TitanMS!! Untraceable2U ( talk) 09:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
#New maplestory private servers mods#
Some mods will have to moderate the MapleStory private server sections more now. This would be the same for other servers too (WoW servers etc.) Jis2507 ( talk) 01:09, 27 June 2011 (UTC) MapleStory Private Server A page that would discuss the history and legality behind RSPSs would be better served than a simpel combined one. Redirecting to a single "server emulator" page doesn't really do justice to the topic of Runescape Private Servers. I think that there should be a seperate section for RSPSs. Untraceable2U ( talk) 08:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC) Another Section? Moparscape is the true patched 317 client, and you can get Sources at that location. Frugooscape is a server/client that does not help in the development of it. Somone had placed Frugooscape into the RSPS Thing. Mi ra 04:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC) The language and grammar in the article is still quite terrible, so I added a copyedit tag. Kethinov 00:25, 15 July 2006 (UTC) Cleanup Ĭan we now remove the cleanup template? Jestix 21:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC) I've removed the cleanup tag, i like bananns but this article still needs references, so I've added that tag in its place. So long as it is made known in the opening paragraph that the term is colloquially accepted and widespread, but not technically accurate, then I have no problem with the article and would be willing to contribute to it and improve its quality. Jestix 21:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Īs the main critic of "server emulator" I can confirm Jestix' report of a consensus being reached. Samba being a windows-file-server emulator. licq beeing an icq emulator, gaim beeing an aim emulator. there is valid concern, that the term may be used with analogous logic to e.g.server emulator therefore violates the traditional understanding of the an (cpu) emulator. emulators in the traditional always refered to emulation of hardware, either hardware by hardware, or hardware by software.(this can be backed up with a lot of links, on google, on slashdot, on open directories.) the term is widely used in MMOG community.The main arguments towards the consensus are: As I've also a lot of other things to worry about than server emulations, I will in future now with this also leave this page for other community edition.
Due to this consus all discutants feel the "critism of the term" section no longer needed. Just to report, after an long (off-wikipedia) discussion the new opening sentence is now a consus, now seen valid from all discussing sides. 06:47, (UTC) Consensus on opening sentence Its the sense of an encyclopedia to primary relate to itself! Do not revert prior to discuss here, why external links are better than external. Emulator Resource has taken its place - Celeron ER 03:45, (UTC) Again PLEASE use innerwiki links in wikipedia.
Any other up to date list of emulators? - Agamemnon_god 03:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC) Yes, is dead. Is dead? It has been down for some time.
0 kommentar(er)
